The philosophy of the (non-)monogamist ppl. An objection to the normative premise of & yesterdays (conservative) !
Christian view of life & relationships that of the reality of .
Of - !

( christian) (happy) Sexual Monogamy/ (just) another brick in the (old cultural) wall (v.2.0)
[ against , the process of rational ; pro - equalizing the (ratio of) redistribution of girls/women to a man]
Monopoly/non-free. Monotony/non-/non-novelty. Mono/non-stereo.

[, a fact of the matter, lovely Jos,
like it or not, is, in 21 century, the ppl -
(non-) ,
in practice a more of a sequential-polygamy , than ever before!]
[(How to) Take all these
out of the real ppls relationships in thought, motivation & action;
out with the monogamy; out within youself, lovely Josephine?!]


Well, lovely Jos, its all about the real sexual(ly liberated) self!
You either achieve it or not! Most (of the) ppl dont [cannot]!

Its about rationally living and having sex and the city (liberated) /mentality in the 21 century!
Its really hot, diversity,
novelty, interesting sexually free.
[Or one can preferably choose the (--) /mentality of the 20-th century.
It aint really hot, but monotonous.,
, stagnating sexually unfree.]


Of course, it
s not for all the ppl (of today);
its not even (good) for the (irrational) majority of ppl;
its a choice consciously made by some of the
() ppl.
This stuff is a game
(in rational sexual context) () ppl of 21 century.
Anti-monopoly, anti-monotony
/anti-() & (free) multi tasking (enjoyments).
[, , is good for the (highly) productive //big city boys & girls of the 21 century,
might not nessasarily be good for the ppl in .
Its
( or , ?) to the population (volumetric mass) density
of the
() ppl in a region (, that are less than 44 years of age)! ! Did you know this, lJ? ]




 

 

 

- ; Let me educate you, Let me entertain you, a?!
(old cultural) (fe)male has had just one sexual partner of ones own summer years, (s)he ( of this irrationality)
, , () the absolute joy of , of , of the greatness of (sexual) variety.
- in his own autumn years, because of our human nature (, of having 3- sexual partners in ones own summer years), -- -
of an irrational (& petty) . , , .
Dont be
stupid, lovely Jos!
Dont be
old culture female! Dont be a brick in this old cultural wall!
Or else
really absolutely , that ( & forever young) , really for ;
and at the end youll
the choices you didnt make and the chances you didnt take.
Dont be a dumb mono, stupid! Be real smart (at least 5.1 dolby) stereo!
An individual can, could and do have a happy second love_&_sex relationship,
real in a lifetime! Thats natural; thats real human nature. () in a lifetime ; real ; is choice - for a (fe)male.
I do not approve of
rational , () to be boring, although its OK with me, some ( to) like - in the longer run. Its their owm choice; they will live with it.
Taka
, or - , every choice/action, accordingly ; you know whom by.
OK?

Mak : Man has imagined a heaven,
and has left entirely out of it the supremest of all his delights,
the one ecstasy that stands first and foremost in the heart of every individual of his race -- and of ours -- sexual intercourse!
It is as if a lost and perishing person in a roasting desert should be told by a rescuer he might choose and have all longed-for things but one, and he should elect to leave out water!

Flemming Rose [The tyranny of silence / & multiculturalism]:
Before the Enlightenment, the Church perceived verbal attacks on doctrine as physical attacks on the Church.
The achievement of the Enlightenment was to separate words and actions. And to me, that is a very important distinction between a civilized and an uncivilized country.

To be or not to be monogamous? (ratio of 1:1 , of 4:1)
That is the question, lovely Jos.
To be or not to be, in your one-time lifetime? How about that!
To be poly?
To be away from () ;
(sometimes, for some time) ( )
-, -(sexually),

a stuff, that you ( & ) passionately ?
Yes, lovely Josephine,
its about
, the voluntary (& truly rational!) (the really different) ppl, in different space-time [of different lifestyles & lifetimes]!

Of - poly !

Well, it takes, lovely Jos,
real
,

really great passion,
and risk,
of course,
() ppl, lovely Josephine,

as usually,
absofuckinlutely dream [& talk] about it
(more & more sexual enjoyment),
, ,
(in reality) ( );
(to try some form of poly),

until, Omfg,

its too late [and they cannot do it, ()]. , ?!
Yes, the huge majority of the ppl, lovely Josephine, absofreakinlutely ()!
conform to the prevailing opinion of the prevailing !
(all and each of the real) () cannot [& do not] experiment/experience [the difference]!

And they never know/understand the difference! ! What a waste!
( , !),
lovely Josephine,

do not ( in the yesterdays/past) (try to)

force (as the right social///cultural/societal norm)

--

i.e. to be monogamous till death do us part,
//the good social norm,
human individual!
[, it is n-o-t!
T, , immoral the Society (redistributive) , upon the girl/woman,
must
marry experience (to identify, & , through the process of) motherhood!

No, its a matter of a rational choice, the biological urge ones onto the next ! Free choice, , personal/individual .]
Let it be, lovely Josephine,
,
(to) be & sexuality -
all (of) these (, -rationally, & productively- , earn-, happen),
in your
(pleasurable & celebration of) life,
, !
Sex(uality) is an objective (personal, individual)
value; its a fundamental & primary (ir)rational reward & motivation.
Let there be a
(matter of ) choice. Individual choice!

A rational man , , this (social) , (as) accepted by the [or by a minority].


, lovely Jos,
make love,
voluntary, passionately & beautifully,
but not war
/forceful action;
,
( the female part of it),
should and ought to have the freedom to rationally (.. & ) choose [customize] - what is (really) best, best for each of them, for both of them!

*

Do you like to have ( ) breakfast at Tiffany/Victoria's?
Do you
like () variety [of other different (fe)males];
how about monopoly;
monotony/;
do you wanna make the sexual relationship outside one and only one (fe)male
(in a lifetime) virtually impossible?
Do you currently practice (non-)monogamy,
(younger) lovely Jos? Oh, gosh! Oh Gosh! Ooooooooh, Gosh!
Do you like,
is it OK,
to flirt
/ to have ( loveable, pleasureable for your own body & mind) affairs; to do flirting? no, no, no (real) flirting?!
Do you like orientalism?
Romanticism; intense emotions?
How about (dis)liking
Islamism,
[do you Jos, by the law of
/
of life, liberty, property

the inferior human as compared to men,
stone to death? Oh, Golly Gosh!]
or Christianity,
or
,
or Catholicism,
or Protestantism,
or
,
or mao/dao//tao/bud-ism,
or any other
form of ( )
//?
how about (dis)liking the(social) Darwin?

 

Polyamory (from Greek πολύ poly, "many, several", and Latin amor, "love") is
the practice of, or desire for,
intimate relationships where individuals may have more than one partner,
with the knowledge and consent of all partners.
It has been described as "consensual, ethical, and responsible non-monogamy".

polygamous [ pəˈlɪɡəməs ]

relating to or involving polygamy.

"polygamous societies"

zoology

(of an animal) typically having more than one mate.

Well, lovely Josephine, (s)he is not monogamous!
But I
absolutely know, lovely Josephine,
I understand,
absofuckinlutely ,
,

Omfg,

[the movement (of mankinds living is)

from the traditional/prevailing monogamy/ culture
to polygamy matingand
dedication
i.e. the post-marriage free ,
of the voluntary chosen obligations & absofuckinlutely no selfless utopic ideologies!]
really / ,

[, , yes, lovely Jos, look around and you could rationally see,
we the ppl/nation//world
do really
(move) towards this (organization);

and Jos, do not forget, the of the females (eggs)

are really -evolutionary- oversupply, when compared to the quantity of males?! OK?
, 19 2 more that of the males! How about that!]
most lots of functionally [really] educated & rationally thinking ppl
.. & (in doing, in achieving objective results) (fe)males.
[, ,
most of (fe)males,
, ,
into the sexual/marriage relationships.
, !
!
Full of , , dishonesty, ( ) !
( psychologically ; its a completely life-changer, style-changer and could be character changer!)
60-70%
of lies , all over! , ?
, that stupidly do it, ! Always.
, drain of (, , psyche: & ) energy .
No exceptions possible.
Infedelity is all about getting ones own -spiritual- needs met, within a particular relationship! No exceptions.
The sexual need is
(essentially) spiritual need;

its natural, innate, comes and is controlled by ones own (non-)objective mind - (ir)rational morality/values/principles/desires, mentality, culture, beliefs and self-esteem.
A person goes outside a particular relationship, lovely Jos,
when hes not really getting his needs met
/ by -cannot meet the- in the particular relationship- according to an (ir)rational & (non-)objective standard.
Do you live on Earth to not satisfy your needs?

Do you not need to have/communicate and exchange close fundamental values (and sexual, too; flirting, too!), in the long run?
Where do you wanna draw your own personal/individual boundaries - based on your morality?
How about compatibility (in values/principles/actions/motivations/ambitions), in the long run?
Intimacy is much more than sex;
having/exchanging/sharing the same world of values/principles for , just an act!]

I absolutely ,
,
irrationally ,

absofuckinlutely (sexual) , !
[, different, to the , ]

I absolutely know, we (the ppl of the early years of 21 century)
are living in the first
liberated age

7%-15% of the ppl in the civilized world

(and erotics, and sexuality)
, or dirty deeds
untroubling
/non-confusing
&
un
matter/ to (rationally) talk about; and joyfully practice it - a lot of it!
Making love is really great!
Making love,
(clean) lovemaking,
r-e-f-u-s-e-s to always match with (romantic) love! OK, lovely Jos?
Most of the ppl of today,
choice between
being loved

being honest (in their sexual imagination, desires & stuff)

! ? !

I absolutely know,
any
absolutely (and absolutely does) , lovely Jos,
absofuckinlutely always [sometimes () ]
in all the
- relationships,
( love & real )
a couple ( ) or not! Its funny; its a bore; its unreal, not (fe)male nature. OK?

I absolutely , e really absolutely &
to () love one partner

, lovely Josephine,
to ( want to) have () passionate sex with another partner! Yes!
Its absolutely &
to be a () rational/good/smart character
to () like , or some other (non-normative by the collectivistic evaluation) stuff!
OK, lovely Jos?
Its a matter of free (rational)
choice (to rationally admit & satisfy ones own sexual preferences) - thats all! Really!
A real love (.. valuing, respectful & )(+, +) relationship, lovely Jos,
is absolutely possible
(to happen, to be earned/achieved/attained) in the long run,
two or more ( productive; really ; truly moral & practical) characters/ppl!
- , , ; is a master-slave relationship. ?
Thats the fundament(al stuff).

*

Lucius Annaeus Seneca: Religion is regarded
by the common people as true,

by the wise as false,
and by the rulers as useful.

The old (moral, political & economic) world order:
One King/Pope, that divinely [i.e. coresively] rule all the rest of the ppl for the(ir) common good(ness)!
Its psychopathic control/regulation! Its slavery! Its (theological) totalitarianism! Its really just another brick in the (traditional) wall!

[ vs The new (One) world order is authority vested in the few! Its slavery! Its () ! Its egalitarianism!]

, ,
in absofreakinlutely practice, lovely Josephine, , , /apply values,
,
in fact, the main of , , (all kinds of) !
,
lovely Josephine,
(
oldest of) !

It all started long, long time ago, with the monopoly of the (for many centuries) (access & aquiring of) knowledge, information & all the rest of stuff!
life (of an individual) was really absofreakinlutely nasty, brutal and short; and the ppl had been very, very much tribal (and primitive)!
During that [absofuckinlutely ] period of time [for 99.99% of all the ppl], lovely Josephine, God (absofreakinlutely ) existed, was real!


,

sexual monogamy,
, lovely Josephine,
absofreakinlutely
( very /greyish, vastly , poorly, painful, non-enjoyable),
absofuckinlutely [ /teology; of the Mono(theistic) Christianity],

of Allah/ -,
[ /moral/values

, lovely Jos, vs secular & rational /]

{the 1:1 officially recommended -redistributive ratio of women to a man, the quattro - / 4:1 (4 wheel driving system; 4sexualization; 4motion) ratio!
But , , lovely Josm
the right is the / , an irrational institution -of power/control- .}

, lovely Jos,
[, a , Middle East
i.e. the heart of the
quattro s /:
(-) moderate

being away from the secular, , the progressive, , , !]
[ , in the name of
God///Lord - Jesus// .. ( based on religious) faith]
-, dominant - & social ! [in fact, more, much more than a King/Government.]

 

( ///-ism ),

( ),
[ / /,
// relationships
, lovely Jos,
duties, obligations/!
in fact the Government! Omfg!]
(the despotism of) the Dark ages, lovely Josephine,

really , , absofreakinlutely (, , really ),

, , ,

and very, very much (absofuckinlutely!) corrupt [dishonest], (dont you get a , Josephine?)
, , violence, (its aggressive) [ /the serfs]

- ( , !) -
:
[ (, , ) ,
,
(fundametalistic) !]

the heart of darkness!
the extremely bloody ,
[/
the war
//warfare & dishonesty /culture of the right / -
//
/ the prosperity & progress]

/ ,
[ 1492.,

/ ]
all in the name of God [; the goodness] -
-
[] ( , Islaam & Judaism ) ,
,
! !
do-gooders () , great !
,

the huge ,
bloody bloody ,
, ,

in the name of the Righteous Cause of the religion/church//:

to save ( , ) the souls of humans;

& to obey & know God/Allah/Superspirit

,

good/righteous person, one day, such a man , !

The Righteous Cause, organized by do-gooders,
, bloody & suffering all over the nation/region/world!

Oh, that (idea of) righteous cause ( , the common good/interest cause),
oh, that
righteous persecution,
oh, that salvationism
//fairness of the religions

the evil , , ,
coercion,

in the name of ( ) the righteous cause!
[e.g. saving the souls of , into ( ),
/
obey (the ideas of) ! , !]
What a
n absofreakinlurely

terrible, terrible life
( honest, ) /serf
; ! ! Dark ages for humanity!

, , lovely Josephine,

/Pope,

immensely , through ( by selling!)
of ;
[a document for , by the Authority//;
much -
i.e. () free pass to Heaven,

.. keep away from Hell,
, big, very big ]
() () , lovely Jos,
absofreakinlutely
(bad, wrong, !) irrational

( ) ,
e all over

- ,
,
prosperity
of
[banksters] (, & , /-) ;

( ) , lovely Josephine,
& absofuckinlutely ( age of 15),
-
lust, sexual fetishes & primitive ( "Lolita" ?),
, lots of
, , , , ,

, ,

and sexually abusing [raping] (especially very, very small)

() boys [minors]!
h, those f(reaking) , [, of today, especially , all over the world]
most of them
(and ), all over the world, lovely Josephine,
!
[, , , lovely Jos,
real ,
,
really , , ! !
( ) ?!

, ?]
///
a / & shame into the minds of the (fe)males, regarding their sexuality;
and the Holy Book, lovely Josephine,

have condemned getting pleasure out of & in the minds, motivations and of (fe)males,
absofuckinlutely , , value - ! !
In reality,
rationally thinking,
, lovely jos,
the human mind the greatest (ever, for all times)(and the most different of all)
sex
organ [tool] ! [, which could/can/does supply us with the greatest (ir)rational pleasure and joy, that a living human experience]
Yes, lovely Josephine,
yes, human
[(ir)rational] sexuality (& sex action)
is rooted in human [(ir)rational] values, [ (non-)objective principles and (in)consistent efforts]
which produce a humans [(ir)rational]
vison of ( ) life!
, lovely Josephine,
absofreakinlutely / /// -
their visions
of sexuality,
f sex,
of life,
of the human-
()! !
,
gorgeous?

[dont think & do what ppl tell you -that is just & right- to think & do;
think
rationally & /, and then do!
, -possitive ot negative- /earn-!]
Let me ask you, then -
(when, where and how often)
is
(voluntary making of)
sex truly lovely? Or is it not?

 


over -
ancient time, , lovely Josephine,
(in the minds of many ppl)!

 

St. John Chrysostom: The Church is above the State,
in the same way
as the soul is above the body and
heaven above the earth,
and indeed far more.

(really dark) [and ever since the ancient -primitive- times], lovely Josephine,
( ) ,
() [ ] ( of) //religion!
,
,


- of the idea(l) of the (religious) do-gooders!


the well intentioned , absofreakinlutely force/,
() , ,
() the view/belief/ of the Oh Mighty /!
[ , lovely Jos,
/
the dominant & despotic - dogmatic-religious our galaxy/, - ]
, lovely Josephine,


-the
(, , or -)sexual monogamy-
! , .
?

 


[The (civilization of the) world, lovely Jos, for the last 30 000 years,
has been moving
from the primitivism of absolute (
& mental) collectivism/tribalism
to the privacy of individualism!
From (acting on) emotionalism to (consistently using) rationality [logical ]!]


, from the perspective of the history for the last 30 000 years, lovely Jos,
- (collectivistic) -individualistic in our everyday life!
ppl, lovely Jos,
in the next few generations, if based on the rational morality, ( of) ,
really () the individual as an individual,
() , () other than rationality!
Rationality in thought, motivation & action (for all the important questions) applied long-term! Yes!
really (more) for the (more) harmony [of the relationships] of the individuals!

, lovely Josephine,
-
happily /the serfs!
{by grouping into tribal communities for more security and less costly
i.e. minimixing the risk through co-operation,
based on self-interest of fighting danger together! Of (ir)rational
outsiders ppl from other tribes/groups!}
[ , lovely Jos,

n ,

of tribal communities, the great majority of (tribalsitic) !

Yes, lovely Jos, in the best interest of their survival!]
(of security, safety & stability, in the immidate term);
(dark &) .
, lovely Jos,
- [serfdom]
( ) -
( ) ,

,
the very much () /masters.
!
(, of the ppl for the )
, lovely Josephine,
.. of the aster.
.
!
?

*


, lovely Jos,
( !)
( pair) (the smallest group/community/!)
(economic)
,
(mutual interest of survival of the species, within a group/tribe//pair, , labor for each other)
,
, , ,
(, , , seltakis) .
(, economic)

/pair//!
[, , : , , of the smallest ;
outside the tribal group/community,
,
/
, lovely Jos,

..
opposing & (///violently/aggressively) clashing
between each other!
Because they have different
/, !]
, lovely Jos,

:

, "" -
( old times )
()
.. - of the Dark ages,
, lovely Jos,
,
( ) [wrong interpretation]

( priests are the leftists, behavior - in thought, motivation and action!).
3rd world countries,
( tribal /)
, , ,
, , lovely Jos,

,
,
!

sticking really together,
[a communistic family/partnership
in the name of personal survival &
having sex mainly for reproduction enjoyment
there had not been no the pill - it (, ) wasnt invented yet;
a family
union/partnership is based on individuals & their choices!]
,

.
,
,
( )
of ()
& ( )
peace of mind: (body and mind) pleasure & satisfaction -
,
/social/ .

*

( , ) , lovely Josephine,
the (ir)rational
, /mindset-
( - - absofuckinlutely tiny, but brutal !)
i.e.
the prevailing (ir)rational [idea(l)s, , principles] [views of the world/human]
(long-term) space-time [ ]! OK?
,
(, ,

, ,

a small number of

happy people, drinking good drinks, eating good food, listening to good music, making good love, laughing and smiling,
experiencing good 2Us)
- , lovely Jos,
(, tribal)
()
(of the 7 deadly sins/vices: passionate desire (lust), gluttony, greed, sloth, wrath, envy and the most serious of all the 7 sins: pride)

( , , above 99,5% the history of ,

into a tribal (-, o- & no subjective rule type of) organization of society,

, to make the human species to feel guilty of the ,

keep the huge majority of the people, in a nation, dominated/dictated by a small, very tiny plutocratic/ elite of smart ).
, lovely Jos,
a free and prosperous society
needs
&

separation of the Church/ [religion] from the State and vice verse, too

separation of the State from the Church/ [religion] (in all shapes & forms, e.g. in taxation too)!
() ( - - ), lovely Jos,
(& / )
real
-
(-) [],

[oh, yes, /Allah/

(irrationally) , all over the world -
into (the rhythm of life of) / hard/explicit ,

e.g. , , , , , !]

,

( centuries of the morality) [ -, () , ! () ! irrationality!],
, /abusing ,
( ) (i.e. , ),
[] absofreakinlutely ,

absofuckinlutely (irrationally) ("" , - ) , & ,
, ,
!
[ ,
, serve ,
: life, liverty, property and pursuit of happiness]
{By the way, , (dis) -the idea of- Last Tango in Paris?}

 

 

 

And , lovely Jos,
the
monopoly of the -God
(access & aquiring of) knowledge, information &
all the rest of stuff [through devine
revelation]
the monopoly of the -God!
[, the monopoly of () -God
(The of & )]

 

,
[church is a power -& money- structure! 200 - the Age of the Enlightment- it was the power structure, on Earth!]
70-80 , lovely Josephine,

[because of -the general march towards the secular humanism- more and more ppl, in more and more nations and the sexual revolution of the 60s;

, the -morality & propaganda/media of- Communism/Socialism coersively, , & culturally

the Cristian to pool back ]
!
( ; , )

Thats real (for the) good! Yes, it really is.
(in islaam nations f the West) ( completely)
(, because of the increasing quantity & quality of the secular ppl - smart ppl, rational & civilized ppl)
[] & ;

[ , , , lovely Josephine,
, ,
!
, ( ) -
the dark ages, in terms of lacking & lack of ,
(irrational, non-practical and non-objective) moral absolutes!
, , , , ,
4
at the same time ,
absolutely , & his , of course, -
.. , - , .
, - .. a limited up to 4 women, per one marriage?! !]
of
.
.

( ) -
a, lovely Josephine,

absofreakinlutely ,
absolutely (into the corner)

( ) (especially the ) !
[ -
mixutre of group
into the oneness of the irrational/tribal (aggressive & very ) collectivism/oppression]
{
A 1944., , () !}

*

[ ] , lovely Jos,
(bad/wrong)
,
[, , / of the group/Party/Government/Parlament/President/elite,
cheating & stealing , lovely Jos,
,
() ]
,

- ,
, lovely Josephine,
absofreakinlutely :
, ( )
collectivists-, ( )
,

, lovely Jos,
(BG) ( -),
" secular government force& fraud
idealistic - faith, "!
[, // loves mystically (!) , , secular of the State]

[bolshevism - group against group, (polit) (polit) ],
() - ,
,

de facto - /regulation/intervention collectivism, (based on its irrational //)

, , , , - .
, lovely Josephine,
( & ) ,

transgendering itself,
(/) ,
, ,
both - !

Love or , ?

: , says history!
(how about b-o-t-h, ah?!)


Tell me, babe, do you (not) agree,
marriage is just a legalized prostitution?
[Do you, love Jos, do you
understand/know, love, the romantic love is (a dream)(lasting) just for kids under 29 & characters of above 45?! How about some gold digging, ah?!
Be real smart, pls!
really , you ought to achieve b-o-t-h the love and the or else you cannot & shall not be real happy!
Choose rationally to
(efforfully) be , & psyche unstable (self-sustainable) character of a woman!
you shall be & of a healthy woman! and how about your close (sexual) partner(s)? well, they too ought to be smart females!
Emotionally rationally choose
/happen/make/afford your own lack od stability perspective

but pls, lovely Jos, dont, for rational sake, be just another fucking (BG)(young)(partying/playful) whore!]

 

Frank Oppenheimer ( Robert - atomic bomb): Understanding is a lot like sex;
its got a practical purpose, but thats not why people do it normally.

(.. essentially do sex - for the reproduction joy of it)

: " , - !"

: (the irrational majority of) ( , a?!),
the sex natural for all (normal, civilized) human beings!

, for every healthy (fe)male, filled with regular & passionate (romatic love &) sex
terrible/meaningless , no matter how wealthy or not -
negativism, agriness & skepticism!
Well Jos,
you
(always) need the right/rational person
to have a romantic-sexual affair with
(, , your partner to be a great intellectual, an irrationalist or youll have really big problems of obedience).
Everybody does, long-term.
Love,
,
really and live/flourish your life to the full, - and make it be full of regular & passionate (romatic love &) sex!
your highest and best self - according to your own capabilities & capacity!

Well Jos,
rational
( knowledgeable) (in thought, motivation and action; and do, do, do a lot in your lifetime, expert knowledge )
& ,
with really good looks (of body),
consistently & persistently fulfilled in (and love, love, really enjoy) romatic love & sex (, ),
consistently & persistently fulfilled in your economic health,
use only the
faith-based scientific-based method in your evealuations, judgements and justifications,
good to yourself every day and everynight!

The older model Bible says, there is only one model for the marriage the religious model [v.1.0] of -;
and all other models
( ) are weaker or fraud, and do [can] not work! !
Now, lovely Jos, lets talk about the second model - the old () model [v.2.0].

*

-, lovely Josephine, () ( , 33 ),
- (and the, Omg, , too) -
( , passion; -) [ can fall in love; to fall out of love! OK?],
[,
, , lovely Jos, absofuckinlutely for ages of times!]
, , ultimate human contract /monetize...
--------
{ , (, ),
sex- must be , ! Omg!
completely wrong;
, lovely Jos, ,
- - , , , , ! !;
objectively /true/ : sex before marriage , , not wait after the marriage!}

, , absofuckinlutely
-the First, the One, the and the Only in a lifetime- 1, (, and standing - - before God//)
with -the First, the One, the and the Only- ()( chosen) 2
[to not have neither love nor sex with anyone elsee-v-e-r; no matter the poverty, sickness/illness, worries, not even complete and utter miseryno matter nothing, you hear me, ?! ?]

(an irrational in some or in some secular groups within a society of the)
sharing ones own entire love with the One and only -prince(ss) in ones own lifetime
?
[ , , objectively !
The objective truth is, 21 , , lovely Josephine,
within the ,
- 66%
of all of them - / - marriages!
,
lovely , could transform into !
If , -if rational-
for a long time, , truly , self-!)

, you only, only, only (can) get sex, when you marry3 to the [One of the] opposite ;
no
sex until you get married preach- [& , too]!
, ,
(actually doing it) ?


It's the (essence of)
conformity, stupid!
The (application of) pragmatic (approach of the) conformism/conformity - (obedience)
to a
(tribal) culture/social norm/ of the (democratic)
-(Socialist, Nationalist, Social/)/Society!


, .
K
..
//protectionism,
, lovely Josephine,
(, ) -God,
(non-objective law making & ). ( )?
- , , ""
[ officialy , by law; managing/transact of a property!]
()

.. ( & supported by the religious)
sexual !
,
( ) ,
a objectively practically
!
,
[lack of free market; lack of competition],

no matter kind of,
always tries to
() ( )
-
-- (your & energy),
, - e , , it the monopoly!
Its
[social, , , ()] parasitism, stupid!
,
, regulated
really () ( , , , civilized & secular projects/products) -
/lack!
objectively
( -through the Governments regulations & actions- )
create & / -
,
my , very very ,
( , , ) ,
, lovely Jos,
!
(, this , monopoly of mine!)
, lots of - very much , lovely Josephine,
, , , (reasoning) [of the individual(s)],
free

(-) !
[e.g. , regulated & controlled/monopsony ,
-regulated banking system,
regulated & controlled & education ,
regulated & controlled & ]
-God absolutely , ,
,


[ - - monopoly machine

- , as an option, in a semi-free societies, , , -, , making it --

]
sexually
(i.e. sexual exclusivity) the (, normal) marriage () institution!
[and no more (other) lovers(-to-be) (are allowed)! No, no, no! No exceptions!
absolutely ! One life, one marriage, one parter, one lover! ?! , Omg!
No, Jos, no, no, no - love
to be in a lifeteime; and it usually is not
..
, , ppl could & do experience several times in their lives! Yes!
Love, a true love is not like the truth - universally , and !
(
the feeling of) , (small letter!) [which is based on the of reality]
, universally - cannot have , ,
a (wo)man () into rationality psychological rationalization, a fallacy, a delusion! ?]
The machine, lovely Josephine, , & ,
(- humans),
,
(official recognition),
(, , , )
/ (of marriage)
(officially)
-
,
[, mutual love, , lovely Jos,
cannot be objectively & contracted/promised - for ever, till death us do us apart!
earn-/// everyday, by all () !]
,
/ !
,
(how about -?),
(in vain, arbitrary, casino) ( ; la grande; ) !
Pls, lovely Josephine, dot you ever confuse (and kill) the (deeply/strongly) passionate
-
with
the
() marriage, children & everyday (and problems);
you cannot
have them both, in the longer run! Dont make me laugh - on that general stupidity!


[and the religion, too] is
trying to / ()
- .


,
, lovely Jos,
[& ; usually under 27-29 years of age]

easy entry, another brick in the wall!
(of -what kind of?- )
-, lovely Jos,
( )
(Omg; !), h_ ,
() (, how very bad, how very shameful, especially if you are a woman!)
(how about ?!)
,
,
[ essential ,
- /, & time consuming: & ]

[ at the end] spent ( , - , - , !),
[],
,
, (long time taking, relatively expensive) !
, finally , lovely Josephine,
absofreakinlutely /objects h
/ , ( )
, -- !
[ , , , , worrying, stess, , , , imposing as an effect - burden ]
Hard & expensive to give up
/ to exit out!

*

 

, if you are really () [] , never, never say Yes in marriage/partnership,

by your hearts certainty
..
if only feelings & emotions (, based on attraction / loneliness, angriness, pregnancy, getting out/away from something/someone, age preference, etc.) !
But instead, lovely Josephine,
try,
as much as you really can,
to rationally
(by reason) think & see [and act],
in terms of objective values/principles & characteristics
/properties/attributes/personality
of the (fe)male that wants you to marry him/her
i.e. do not make just
heart [& intuition] felt conclusions,
, I know ( ?!),
, ,
of age below 23-27 years (fm-m) ( above average, for BG) intellectual guy,
is very, very hard,
but not, not, not impossible;
[, , its a fact, that almost all ppl of age less than 27 and above23,
-
fatal- , especially concerning love/, can produce very bad consequences; Lifes full of all kinds of surprises, especially under 33-35!]
,

: "", ,
[ ] (theres nothing really to be changed in ppls hearts! A heart cannot be changed. Ppls minds can, could and should be. Rationally. OK?),
,
,
.
[ ] judge ,
, too much
.. you have been dishonest/insincere to yourself and to the other partner.

***

, , , ,
,
, ,
() always, always, absolutely always,
,
,
in this conflict between your heart and the mind

follow the money, sex, feelings, emotions, pleasure, urge
() of the mind, supported by your strong !
, if you, lovely Josephine,
choose
() -
(the way leading to) () !
Never ever let your own self to be guided by (your) emotions & feelings
(applying) practical/objective principles/considerations
else you shall be disappointed ( ) and UNhappy, in the longer run!
, lovely Jos,
e
, all irrationalists (and cannot , ) in the long run!

*

- never stay in a miserable marriage!
No, no, no, never do it,
if you think that you are feeling miserable being with the other partner.
Why the fuck should you sacrifice your lifetime happiness
(to another person, , that you do not love and makes you feel miserable);
why the fuck you ought to feel miserable all your life?!
(, Ive seen BG married couples doing this, because of they culture & inverse moralities)
this action / ,
which you will ; you have to clearly know this, no matter you are male or female.
No partner in a (true) love relationship... should feel that he has to give up an essential part of himself to make it viable. ― May Sarton.

Everybody said, "Follow your heart". I did, it got broken ― Agatha Christie.

-
<
to fall (in)> love (thats irrational, stupid, totally emotional i.e. incoherent/inconsistent/arbitrary, totally unpredictable/contingent, in the long run; do not fall, do not fall into),
love! (rationally, passionately, on merit/values) (your partner, )
Love can
(happen and) be a life changer, - () positive or negative!
One way or the other,
everybody
his own adventure(sss), lovely Jos,
pays the price [of his (ir)rational love action(sss)],
accordingly
(for each adventure). Dont take that seriously! Really!
Its your life, thats at stake.

, lovely Josephine,
your own happiness - of your own one and only living , (with)in the one and only reality.


*

A [traditional] marriage-minded (wo)man.

The traditional (conservative) morality ,
,
is (not for enjoyment & is) meant
to be shared with only one
(the & the special!) person -
(presumably) your (one and only!) spouse (that will bring you all the love you neeed)! One! In a lifetime! Congatulations, !
[Youve got to have sex with the same person (in your only one marriage) for the rest of your life(time)! Congatulations, !]

[Thats an absofreakinlutely irrational thinking (of an irrational culture), lovely Jos.
A wishful (
romanticized dream) thinking. A bad stereotype; a bad pre-conception. Stupidity. Preparing for a negaliving, in the long-term.
, lovely Jos,
nobodys gonna give you all the love & the happiness you need/wish!
(l)earn (achieve & keep, long-term) your own & love all the way through all the different seasons of your lifetime, on Earth!
doing all that stuff by the rational way, that you (really) chose to to the best of your own abilities, skills, , and opportunities.
:
true rationality & objective thinking () ; it takes tim and right timing (and not, not, not before 25-27, for women and even higher age for men)! OK, lovely Jos?
Dont be stupid!



No
truly beautiful [or pretty] (wo)man, lovely Jos,
can really sexually (and psyche) be,
the end of ones own teen years and end of ones own sexually active years,
only with
one [] partner/lover! Thats not possible, !
No rational, , [i.e. strong & energetic] human, lovely Jos,
can really be,
the end of ones own teen years and end of ones own sexually active years,
() of ! Just a spouse! Thats not possible, !
No, no, no richer human, lovely Jos,
the end of ones own teen years and end of ones own sexually active years,
can only be with a single sexual partner, in the longer run! Thats not possible, !
most of the irrational individuals can be with their own spouse(s), only! Thats possible!
OK, lovely Jos? Get that?

No, no, no real (wo)man, lovely Josephine,

can be ( &) satisfied with her own life [in IHS context],

if having as her lover only one other (wo)man in her lifetime!

No, she cannot,

no matter any small talks & explanations about love connections/relationships!

No real woman, lovely Jos,
,

should have children from more than one man! Or else she cannot be a really happy !

A real man could have children from more than one woman,

and yet be happy,

, , , of course, !

OK? Get that?]


Ive (also) been, lovely Josephine, through the old model
till death do us apart
(so I know/understand how it works)
but, you lovely (& young) Jos, dont need
(to) be through it!

[this old/traditional model does not work, anymore - look around yourself and you could see, if not absolutely stupid!
, lovely Josephine,
all the (fe)males, because of their indoctrinated morality,
, , absofreakinlutely sex their teen years , their personal spouse! !
absofuckinlutely (self-) of (the experiencing) real enjoyment,
wouldnt know about it! ! No other sexual partner, since their teens! !
Its hard for me to even imagine this stuff! !
But, you lovely (& young) Josephine,
I really hope,
(to) not be that much
stupid & ! Be a smart female, not a stuck one!
Do pick at least a few alternative
choices by the age above your teens at least !
really
(real) rational !]

I think, lovely Jos,
it is a really good ,
the fact, the traditional (old; outdated; irrational) morality [structure & realtionships]
is already beginnig to (rapidly) die out [right now]!

One day, the () ppl (all over the - countries), lovely Josephine,
much more leftish & rational,
will be really much, much more open to new rational things,
as
the (old, traditional) morality of ( ) dies out!
They will start to (long-term) enjoy their own (individual) life(time),
the really great of mysticism understand/, :
with a long-term partner (sometimes) in general terms ,
but
(the reality is that) it is never great (in sooo many ways) -
as it may, might, should, could and ought to be, lovely Jos! Get it? Dont forget it.
Thats the reality of human nature, done by the evolution
[, no matter, most of the (older) do not, not, not like that].


Forget about the (traditional) morality/, lovely Josephine, :

1.) , , (, should not be during of ones own lifetime),
to be shared with one and (the) one (wo)man only your one lifetime spouse partner, !
Sex
(uality) is low animal ( primitive) desire (its just of the body) -
only for ; , , absolutely
(spiritual stuff) experiencing of joy (I that book in the 70s).
2.) () [, ], () of her special age!
3.) & /, only (wo)man (sexual) , not 23-25 and not after ( of) 35!
( ) ()!
( ) (i.e. ) ; !
4.) , o
absofuckinlutely , anti [] , , ;
(!) ,
when happening! - [of the classes] !
5.) () ()(& rocknroll ) , ! .. [class] i.e. of []!
6.)
doings ! [class] ! , !
, (proletarian-) , the sexual and the social [class contract]?
, ! for the ( of your own) sexual !

This (natural) instinct , ( lower animals) !
(); (primitive) !
;
all you
need, , is : love & (of comrades) and !
, , ;
is
, ! happiness of , of the ()!
7.)
(, ) absofuckinlutely always & & of the //// proletariat,
& ! The () above all, ! Thats all!
() & TV () ; (the imperitive Russian & ) !
(/ of) being a happy ( ) ! The truth! () richness! OK?


[, /
-], lovely Josephine,
(the & , symbol ""// )
(!) , lovely Josephine,
( , )
-
Oh,
!
T
, & [],
- , communitarian morality- & () & social(istic of the) partnership!
, , ( )!
, Omg, ?!.
, , lovely Josephine,
() (i.e. irrationality)
(great) /fraud/parasitism/evilness!
[ these personal/private, . , , , social !
, , , ,
the real victim, , !
Look at BG , , main stream media, & the public servantsobserve their ]
, ( , ?!)
( ) ,
, , ( )
; collectivized property.
, confused , /, of time-space !
, , (written) contract,
, , mutual /faith, ( -)!
, , , ;
(the !) , , (this scam & scum), ,
() the common good/ () /,
() / () !
( )
( ) ;
, equally, equalized
(?!),
() , lovely Jos,
( , , , , all social )
, (?) . Of the /, () / !
() (of the humanitarian & scientific equilizing)
, solo
( , single , married!);
,
; , .
the [] absofreakinlutely ,
,
, , lovely Josephine,
(
), () ! [ , , , communitarian property-] !
() , lovely Josephine,
(inverted , insentives & )
! [, , , , M-L ] !
(, , non-objective) [; ], lovely Jos,
! !
[, , , for the last 20+ years;
, , ;
- , 1989,
lovely Jos,
successfully - it will depend on morality & culture predominately in the BG nation/society, ]

*

 

 

Its about the

o- 4Zs- by the ( , ) majority
for the
(sexual actions of the) ppl that (are able to) do & e-n-j-o-y it, stupid!
love


(the hunt for) - - ( ) - [-]:

ll (the young) ppl (usually under 40, but not only),
no matter that most of them
, do not want to have/do it,
all (deep inside), do want to (get naked and really) do it (if no ones gonna know about it);
do the
(different) sexual experimentation & !
[and let it -the romancing- begingo for it then
be, be, be
and love, love, love -
your
& o values]


The forbidden fruit, lovely Josephine,
objectively really ;
if
and the fruit is real,
absofuckinlutely
that (wo)man cannot be really as before, ever!
(S)hes feeling better
(pleasurable & psyche satisfied)!


Timothy 2-14 and Adam was not deceived, but
was deceived and became a transgressor.

Most of the want to be(come) (super) sexy turning into their 50s!
Yes, (most of
) the ppl, lovely Josephine, really love (doing) sex; they really love being absofuckinlutely sexually horny (& having affairs) with different (wo)men!
[But the irony is that most of the ppl, lovely Jos, cannot really afford it! Its not easy! Its not to somehow mysteriously get horny! No, stupid!
And no, it aint about the collective responsibility! OK? Get it?]


Being a passionate lover is a great pleasure, lovely Josephine!
Making love is real fun, passion, great pleasure for all normal ppl (if they are not downhill in this game).
Every [normal] (wo)man, lovely Josephine,
wants to feel [with her senses & mind] sexually desired [more desirable] by more than one partner. In the long-term!

A (wo)man that has only been sexually [for pleasure, not for reproduction] with one partner for more than 15-20 years,
absofuckinlutely cannot understand (or get) (the autonomy of) her senses; gets mixed up! Thats
stuff,
, lovely Jos, really do !
When a (wo)man is not really free for a long run to make a choice [in the face of real alternative(s)], lovely Jos,
thats absofreakinlutely bad for that individuals psyche [lack of rewarding
a state of anxiety & being upset].
Oh, those (wo)men of (greyish) bitterness!


Its all about the sexual energy [of attraction b/n humans]! Its about [achieving] sexual fulfilment!
Itis all about [
achieving] life-long sexual [erotic] journey! Having good sex [with the other].
Its really a good stuff! Yes, lovely Jos, achieve it & use it, before there is no more! ?
No good sex, no good relationships with your partners! One life-long partner is not enough! Really!
Make love freely & passionately, lovely Josephine! Beware, be aware! Do it really rationally; and voluntary! OK?
Shine on you, crazy diamond! Cmon and shine!
And stay sexually healthy all of your life(time)!

Lovers, lovely Josephine, lovers,
are really for (doing great) love making! OK?
A lover is not to be a spouse! OK?
Theres no such thing, lovely Jos,
as long-term
love with only one partner;
love & sex cannot really run together life-term,
in a face of an alternatives! OK? Get that? Why?
(achieving) really sexual fulfilment, lovely Jos,
long-term with one and the same
(wo)man,
is an objectively diminishing (in quality & frequency)
!
A human really ( ) to experience real !
A real
lover, lovely Jos,
rationally chooses to experience (great & deep) passions,
not, not, not with only one
(other) human ;
and not, not, not only with the one (and only) spouse! OK?
A spouse is a spouse; a (passionate) lover is a
lover! A moron is a moron!
(mutual) honesty is honesty dont you dare to forget that! OK?
A (mutual) consent is a consent; is free choice of liberated sex! OK?
And one last thing -
you can have a much older (great) sexual partner, lovely Jos,
only in the short or middle term, but never in the longer run! OK?
matters greatly (cannot work in the longer run)! OK?
You should
[ought to] [(l)earn how to] be a really great lover, lovely Jos,
or else you shall be absofuckinlutely missing/misachieving a great value! OK?
This is (a part of) real (free) living! This is (real) life! The life itself!


RR: All normal ppl (until some point in their winter years)
love to make love (and love variety, too),
in a way as if their lives depend on it! Really!
Our genes
/objectively (passionately, in a mammalian way) just die [want] to make themselves reproduce!
They are
programmed by nature & evolution to love ().
There has never
been (in the ) as a prevailing tendency, lovely Josephine,
() (false) !
, 21 ,
the right ! Absolutely.
, , old [religious] norm.
(-) - its too late for them, for they cannot really change.

***

? . !
, - , . , , !
: ! ? ! !
, .
? , .
, !
, , , : , !
--, , , !
, , , , ,
, , !
, , , , ,
!
.
:
,
, .

! ! [practically] .

 


Monagomous monandry, ah?
?


Have you not (secretly) fantasized or dreamed of having (great) sex with (not your current partner, but) some other individual(s)? I know the (true) answer, lovely Jos. You, too.
If youve really had sex with only one (fe)male partner (after youve reached the age of 25; sexual ), you are a truly (absofuckinlutely) ! But youll hardly ever know it! Sorry.



, a rational , lovely Josephine, , , a person their (mutual) breakup!
,
lovely Josephine, really , () !



 

 

Lets continue, lovely Josephine, into our (the extension of the i.e. post )
BG - of the () // .

Today sex is really () everywhere! ( in the western and some of the more civilized cultures) Absolutely!
?
Because sex/sexuality hugely matters;
and sells;
and everyone can
(choose to) buy or sell it - in a free and voluntary way, anyway they like it!
And
(especially, wow, under 69 years of age male) , of all races, of all regions, really do it, practice it.
Yes,
its true! (no matter whether some ppl like it or not, understand it or not)
Its (our human) nature, its energy, its ecstatic, its power(ful), its very, very complex thing!
(every normal person does it, few wanna (seriously) talk about it. That too is true.
Because of our (BG) past, our stigmatized cultural beliefs. Each and every human has an psycho-sexual identity/self.)
Its all that jazz.
, its (really) nice! (and, yes its much, much better that , or any other drugbut it could turn into an addiction)
Its a living.


All the romatic-sexual loving start the same way!

Oh, greatly
(& ),
, that !
Its great,
great until these end, normalize!
you want more
(of it), again! Its .

 

, lovely Josephine, really - & really - (and could be -). Yes, they really are!
, your
() , , , - .
?
(rationally) , lovely Jos?

- extension of the old morality/mentality (wrong, irrational, non-objective, rules).


its never been easier
(& cheaper) (in BG) real (access to) than today! Absolutely!
Its part of the growing
() . Its real nice!
, lovely Josephine, , ?
, , ?

(official) ?

( doing sex)
(,
apart-house & a nice car),
(
, has them needy attributes)?
I did not have sex with that woman! - said
(at the time, the most powerful man in the world) Clinton.
(personally & ) really , ppl?

Can you see the double standard, concerning male-female (& age), when it comes to sex, and sexuality?
( ), lovely Josephine, really ,

() / /, (almost) ( ) ?
, ,
()?
, inside (/ social) guilt?!

(.. to feel guily, )
(sexual passion and emotions)

() subside ,
[ , completetly to change/evaporate; and the sexual electricity, the meaningful passionate /desire to greatly diminish or perish]
() , (, , , big , later, !);
to feel guily, / ?
[for some reason; we live in a - /world;
every thing, everything, has
- at least one (essential) ,
no matter can rationally/ reason/ it or not]

full , , doings ?
(all of which might produce unsustainable emotions & feelings)
(the old morality says) - () , ; too late, a?
, ?
No opportunity,
;
,
opportunities (opportunity cost), ? ( the old social )
To not challenge, to not pursue ( , to not s-a-t-i-s-f-y, to absolutely forbid thyself)
any of them [novelties, diverse desires, (), curiosities, () adventures],
in ones
(long-term part of the long-term relationships in) life(time), ?
No choice; denying the
(moral & intellectual) choice;
,
,

wrong,
ako
(long term, but not randomly, not on an impulse, passionately)
[] ,
just because today , married (on a contract)?

*

, , if (, , very many ppl)
(in) this way,
/unhuman nature/ (in the very, very long run),
( / independent)

(doing a tru) !
Rational choice (in a free/rational society)!

, lovely Jos, (romantic-sexual)
( , civilized & functionally educated//hard working , that have learned the knowledge/practice to live consciously!)
, ,
(, ; -; blind rage)

! (, e absolutely possible, /, out of the blue, a deeply passionate emotion, initially)

,
(-) love [partnership/mating, relationship],

unfold-,
e truly objective and very
privacy, 2Us, achieve- in the space-time (private!) ;
, in fact,
, mutual and voluntary (absolutely ) choice,
rational/free choice,
, earn- deserve- ,
(humanly, in the face of future uncertainty & change .. very day/week/month/year)(we are humans, we make mistakes),
( , )
forcing yourselves to stay together (in the institution of marriage).
individual relationship two adult (>21-23 for women; >27-29 for males) people
after x years of communicating
(. in the sexual way)
(and should not)

in a rational way the marriage institution as such!
[
, , the populistic/religionistic of true companion///one unit of their marriage journey//ritual/,
, , , in the delusion of having/living, each of them, a life of his/her own]
& , lovely Jos,
, ,
to dedicate themselves to each other (, co-dependency is a bad thing for both of them!),
and live together
(under one roof)( generational should never live under one , too!),
for as long as they wishfully decide, without any
(of the marriage institution)
and if they choose (it is a real smart choice) to sigh a valid agreement,
a contract of their mutual living togetherness & terms,
for as far as each of them
(to the best of their /now/present knowledge & feelings)
can (ir)rationally see into the future! (, , no one knows for sure ())
as an social institution ( , ; )
, ,
,
objectively ( < 22-23 > 26-27 years in age).
, lovely
Josephine,
most of the (ir)rational ppl,
(ir)rationally () ;
{,
secretly their main partner a sexual relationship ,
all of these ppl, know about this and at the same time continue their communication between them in fact being irrational!
Do you hear me, lovely Jos?
Clear enough?
If

-you voluntary choose-
UNDER ONE ROOF -
you ought to be open & honest your communication !
Do not do it!
And dont you f
reakingly stupidly talk to me of wild wild angelsof polygamy or monogamy! OK?}
, , them ppl (ir)rationally ()
[()] , [as an integrated part of their own (ir)rationality in thought, motivation, choice and action]
in the longer run.
Look rationally around yourself and youll see it.
Thats because of the
(/ the traditional)
morality.

Trapping a (very, very young & green; or a stupid) (wo)man into ( of) a (romanticized)(unhappy) marriage
[Its the model of the western societies the great () - the females sexual of the 60s & the 70s;
- 1989, the 90s & the 10s westernizarion.]

[the great Clash] Should I stay or should I go [, now]?

The old(er) (, , the -, ) morality/mentality
irrationally & [, a (wo)man ; should; is good]
to (monogamously) stay too long ( for ever long) in the wrong relationship
(, in the name of / )no matter what!
And
sodo the negaliving, pretend ( ), (, )() !
, that really , ones own life(time)!
of living/being! , what an irrationality!

[Thruth is, lovely Jos,
every (wo)man can, should and ought to
really choose (decide)
to stay within a lousy marriage or
if really rational to get out (exit) of it .
And nothing, really nothing in-between, as a choice. No other
choice exist.]


The rational principle (, about 50% of the married ppl are really compromising) is:
compatible, -, stay together & live under one roof, of course;
but if you are not really that compatible (in the marriage, dont you sacrifice yourselves in the name of children or something else, but)
do, do, do the

and because of a real mutual incompatibility

you choose
to (completely) leave the relationship,
but by all means do, do, do
live under separate roofs!
(and you could still value/restect each other, if you choose to)
Its for your own goodness for the both of you. OK?

 

 

wrong// /non-objective
:
() ! [die Familie über alles! !],
( all & beyond other values, above & beyond other principles, - ;
fake- reality-, dishonesty
honesty)
for ever! (and at all costs!, and saved by any means)
.. [] , the spouses/pair
, ,
,
( under ; to be a well kept secret ppl!),
, , /
moral/social/sexual /relationships ;
//pretending/emulating [especially in the social networks, ]
;
oh, we are truuuly and compleeetely happy
pls see us how happy we are!,
good ;
oh, we are truly good (excellent) team!.
?! , ?

() (rational) (of the blood) , a?
very changing & very challenging ;
why
the real
the
single parenting (e.g. the first wives Club, Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band, With a Little Help from My Friends, Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds or being a second/third/n-th spouse), a?
Yes, lovely Josephine,
() , a rational , an irrational !
,
[especially after (mid)40s], lovely Josephine,
()
as a guideing principle is an (absofuckinlutely) irrational ! .
, () (especially their special age] () ! ! !
Look around and you can see if you are, , rational [to be able recognize/evaluate/understand this fact]!


,
, ,
(, , Charles, Charles )
(and experience) (sign of the) your ! OK?
, , ,
old-fashioned ,
() ()
[, all of them males really wanna do is(just) to get laidby someone; I (just) wanna find myself, every day I try, and try, and try to find somebody to (make) love to!];
, cant you, lovely Josephine, see, the reality/thruth of today, ( 21 ), is absofuckinlutely the opposite (to that notion) case
, Omfg,
[, , ()-seductive/inviting) (, the teen & the young adults, 16-37 of age]

is really
, really ( aggressive, psychological , fraud & fake, ())
really /,
, , ! Get it?
[ + gay & = 15%-33% in quantity, , the normal males
..
its a fact, that , lovely Josephine,
& practicing (normal) much less than the rest of the population;
conflicts, all over the world,
-
real/ minority,
it is a matter of impracticality , /impossibility,
if one male is to be limited to ONLY one woman - can not be done (as a principle), (of sexuality, females) to happen]
Its really
,

( )(, his hers sexuality; and her body, above all other stuff, to be hers 39),

() ! !
Well, lovely Jos,
(and how do you reason)
is it (really) worth it,
is it (
) worthwhile,

is it (really) valuable,
is it
/real/objective//true valueor not?
Is it a
value? True or not somethingin-between, a?
, , - ! . ("Life is short. Have an affair!" Billions of ppl do it. Just do it.).
! f!
What a (psycho-)sexual hypocrisy
[ the (younger?) ppl];
at large, we
(Homo sapiens) are in fact,
and sure transact/behave as, like it or not,
multi-male-multi-female
(i.e. ) mating (Homo sapiens) society!
Let me help you
(getting closer to) the right/true answer, that is, if to start with you can (really) & objectively .
Do not forget, lovely Jos,
sexual transaction [action, conduct] is the most private of all transactions [actions, conduscts], in reality;
oh, yes,
lovely Josephine, sex is all about personal/intimate privacy & personal/intimate choices,
( ) ( ) as a norm, as the right social norm!
I beg your pardon [, but I never promised you a rose Garden]! And nobody can (really do it) , !

OK? Get it or not (quite)?

Eastern proverb: "Everything in nature is diversity and diversity is nature."

{And let it be, that way. One life, a few love[r]s! This is , lovely Jos!}
How about (getting)(if you choose to want) some sexual barter, a?
Before you get [to become] some
or some ?

 

We live in a real monopoly Universe/! Have a break, have a variety!
You choose, your lead. Its your own life!
[the great Clash] Should I stay or should I go [, now]?










Well, lovely Jos, how about some ?



sex, , a?
, ,
Josephine?


.
[ , , , , religionists, of
the human(Homo sapiens) /life (of about 100 000 humanity) & e-v-o-l-u-t-i-o-n, 4,54 !

On the Origin of Species, 200 ;
,
ingenious -and the most important idea/innovation in biology-
of e-v-o-l-u-t-i-o-n [natural selection
i.e
. (later, according to Herbert Spencer:) survival of the fittest (best able organisms)
i.e. species change, over many generations, through () adapting to ever changing environments!]
has been proved beyond doubt by disciplines:
data/records//remains & ( ).
,
religionists//creationists & the (social) relativists ()

, ansofuckinlutely {.., all life in the different living species is related over billions of years of time, in the complex tree [history] }
of ( ) life & homo sapiens, that started in the sea, 3 000 million years ago, gathering of chemical to form microscopic cells: the seeds for the tree of life)
[ ; ! , !],
, lovely Josephine,

(absofreakinlutelly irrationally) , , & ,

the planet Earth / as a center of the system,

most of them ,

() , ,

/ 6000 , and absofuckinlutely created by Him, 6 ,
able to sustain life and so many living species, in such a great & extraordinary abundance! ! ]
, lovely Josephine:
the
(really) great ,
( / !)

, (objectively very close connection)

!
[ , , lovely Josephine,

, based on between the (vertical & horizontal development of) species!]

***

 

Homo Sapiens () , lovely Josephine,
basically sexually
[i.e. do not have a monogamous nature! especially the male human],
as a byproduct of the human mechanism
of natural (evolution &) desires

[romantic-sexual intensive/strong passion, affection & lust;
the natural need of diversity
& natural challenging & joyful /adventure,
an affair
/, an experience,
that
(runs) our human nature of integrated mind & healthy body in IHS terms -
which ,
, , & , lovely Jos,
& stable partnership/relationship b/n rational ppland the need of ]

, ?

OK? Get it?

, , , (most of)

, lovely Jos,

(and usually cannot be strictly) (in the flesh) by our nature, in the short longer run!

[usually most of the the ppl really
-in romantic
, emotional and sexual/ aspect-
for the first few years of their relationship
!]
{, - traditional morality -try to-
the wrong/
false idea that we, , are!

this,
21 , lovely Jos,
about 67% males and 51% females
-
living - -
after
, officially, .
How about the real/actual , a?}

Does monogamy have anything to do with love?
Whats (real) love, love,
love (and affection) got to do with it?
it isnt an acient old legend?


Monogany is not our human default setting (in each of our individual minds), done by the reality.
Its a choice to be made by an individual!

Do/can(t) you (really) understand, lovely Josephine,
that its (really) lucky to be born; and you only live/leave (real) short
time, ?

Enjoy! Yes, have a great fun!
[do it] [] [and voluntary], ?

[the great Clash] Should I stay or should I go [, now]?




RR: Chemicals do (really) make my pulse/heart (all of my body & mind; my entity) react. Its called - humans evolution. Its nature.
Its about sexelicious
- of any normal (fe)male i.e. bare (pleasurable) necessities! Yes.
Its a treatment game (of life). Its an objective state of (your) body & mind.
Can you, lovely Jos, make a (real) distinction between (real)(feeling of) love and (real) sexual attraction/infatuation - to another (fe)males?
How about intellectual attraction - to another (fe)males?
How about (asking some ppl) going out on (and doing) some (real) dating stuff? Some hot stuff; to
feel your maximum hottest self -
but not, not, not with only one female in your only one life(time).
(really) many/poly that we can (really) enjoy - each other. Fully. Absolutely!

 

Love (the romantic love, between adult ppl), lovely Jos, is not essentially a sexual stuff!
No matter,
always is a (big) (, but not nessacarily the biggest) part of a love partnership!
OK? Get that?

(casually) , lovely Josephine, (not with your own partner, of age between 18-64)
really (experiencing & ); you look (and feel) wonderful tonight every day?
sticking to only/just one partner ( /)
is not the real challenge ( irrational - everywhere- environment, all the young humans under 35-37)?
() sex, lovely Jos,
is not about
(really) e-x-p-e-r-i-e-n-c-i-n-g personal & passionate (higly intensive) real pleasure/enjoyment, as an end in itself
i.e. it is not //nessesarily means to some other end,
percuing no further goals,
but purely
(choice of having real hot sex for money)

and ,
for both
(, , can be ) partners (as with increasing age, knowledge & you -the really intelligent evolving thyself (smart) character- become more p-a-r-t-i-c-u-l-a-r about your sexual partner)?
Yes,
(, of) sexual (, passionate)
pleasure as an end ( , , , not a duty; not / )

in itself,
as a form of celebrating & sharing
ones own
false self-esteem, joy, peace of mind and life (with someone else; with some other ppl, love to voluntary share/choose it), , !
monogamy and psyche/mental
(-) valuing/exchanging
are
(cannot be) two different things, can be -in the long run- aparted, in a relationship;
do you not think that incompatibility
can arise in the long run
(and you can see/meet your needs in another/different person)?
Do you not think that
(usually) most of the ppl
are emotionaly polyamorous?
(especially the more knowlegable & practical i.e. successful ppl, the objective/productive achievers, in IHS terms)
Can/do you (really) require
emotional monogamy from a real partner;
how about sexual
in the real world; is this how you feel (real) secure?
Do you really know/understand,

emotions ( ), often, very often
can destroy a good
(intimate) relationship/partnership (, , good/valuable/loveable at the beginning)?
Josephine, you gorgeous & sexy
(younger) thing, what (and how) do you think?
Could it be, that the huge majority of the normal humans are not made for a 40-50-60 year
(sexual, , one life-one partner, Christian type of)
commitment (or to be stucked into not/not-comletely happy marriage; , (s)he pack up , moving on)
i.e. are not really made for one time life commitment,
commitment for life
(between only a particular pair of 2 partners), no matter the romantic-erotic tricks that they try (e.g. , , , music, etc.);
may be they are, all other conditions being equal,
, biologically-ready for (normally) having 7-15 year of
a passionate romantic-sexual, intimately & commitment?

[.. ready for, , a few serial relationship commitments/connections, in a lifetime .. having on average about 4-7 different serious partners-lovers in a lifetime]
What and how
(do you feel) about polygamyamory? (voluntary, open & honest ()relationship of mutual agreement - including //journey/attraction, between partners, love, yes & , , each other)
Think
& choose; voluntary, objectively & rationally (its your own choice, in your own life, for your own self):

should I really stay or should I really go (cannot be both at the same time-space , in the longer run)?!
, lovely Jos,
/ (about 60-65% of the) ppl () self-, ( - )
, , resist & (and deny!) this, ()
( ) (persistently), sometimes (their own) ;
[ / / ]
{, (), , by the old/ morality, totally , cannot help them}
so many ppl are
forcing themselves to make love sex -
for so many years, after the first few years
( the first sexual mutual and voluntary /companionship/privacy/partnership)?! !
,
what a time preference (of a deflationary life time, individuals lifespan)!
(, ) /?

basic human sexuality,

/natural/default (humans characteristic; i.e. monogamy is not natural to mankind and can not in fact, be conditioned by Society/God/group),
-
,
[ religionists , , just for the breeding of the human ]
primary (objective social value!)?
The sexual social, about (the need of natural) diversity?
,
if open & honest,
i.e. morally,
when having a close
(sexual) relationship with more than one partner/mate in his lifetime, ?
[ clashing/antagonistic , (passionate love, when young & strong, can be really crazy & great!), rationally male and female ( ), experience- some good time together, when/if having children, and have gone their own ways, living their own lifes, : -, , some time, / .. (absolutely & completely) /cut their human social relationship. Sometimes, things just can, could, ought to not be. Wont be. !]

, ( ) , (the theory of)
(s evolution of the living organisms) ( ) ,
(as social animals) ,
--- (.. naturally ),
,
?

, ,
-
( i.e. pertaining only to you own self, but not universally based on onjective principle)
, an opinion, a personal preference.
. Im OK with that and wish you to be able to meet
,
who can fit to your own subjective preference,
but
(just wishing) it (Oh, that wishful thinking!) does not (really) make it
a universal fact for every human
!
[ , in their behaviours - ;

/relationship to the higher actualizing ability & capacity of the conceptual brain of a (fe)male and the number of sexual parters that he/she has,
less intellectual abilities & capacity, the most /primitive of the mankind, lovely Jos,
in group/ & () - no need to validate their ego, honour and self-esteem

i.e. no matter of in the social-economic Strata,
some people feel/self-perceptivize
/habitualize ( sub- ), some people , Omg, intellectualize their sexuality,
each according to his (ir)rational/(non-)pritive morality & free will/choice. Did you get this, lovely Josephine?]

, (objective, authentic) /truth, lovely Josephine,
(like it or not; believing (it) or not) ,
an
(objective)(and contextual) absolute;
, (rationally intelligent & objective/logical process)
! (and has to be studied & learned, in a non-subjective & non-religionistic way .. the scientific way)
[.. , , moral & ,
based on objective values/principles, , everyday efforts/cares/upgrade of rational knowledge,
,
to be earned/deserved, /mutually;

- (: !) (: , , !) ,
(, / any romantic love, / ) is dissolved/gone, for good;
rational , romantic love, , has gone,
is gone, that like-, , ,

non-2Us, , , rationally ]
Love, , lovely Josephine,

, stays (essentially) ( / of a man & of a woman, )
(no matter, if excellent genes) ( normal) ,
, , ( worryingly experience- ),
[ought to] 2
Us, to perceive a sense of being better off, (short) lifespan;
a (of a human life; normal life)!

A, (, 21 BG) ( )
full of (, sexually, , )
, ( )
, , /dominated
,
( ),
[] () ,
(just) (- 40 ; much less )

(, , -, )
the new ;
, them ppl, lovely Jos,
/choose ,
[ -, - (k)
vs much - ,

opportunity /profit/ & lots of objective success, experiencing pleasure .. 2Us]
being really

-,
-,
-,
,

them ppl

do not [dare to] break up their ;
[ , / .. , -, with some friends]
{ , , , as Q & Q, -, , ;
, , ,
into a relationship; , lonesome ?!}
, , , () () / -,
()
most of these relationships,

do it (take a chance on me, honey)!

Look around, lovely Jos; , do look around yourselves!
relationship/partnership [ really]
(& must be this way; reality-)

earn- & deserve- & exchange- ( 2-, partners; how about 3- or even more?)
every day, every week, every month, year after year
,
mutually,
,
by each and everyone of the partners! ( under living together) OK?
an ongoing process, that never stops.
( relationship), lovely Josephine,
&
() & enjoy- , (- )
(un)consciously choose- & / (, ())!
everyday ()
( ) ( ) () i.e.

, , to celebrate/suffer & [ ()] (and , , to stay away),
,
or ,
create/actualize-
happiness

( !) ( , ; ),

() (, , , - - ! , !)
based on his (ir)rational & (in)consistent values [; mindset] (starting, only starting at the very beginning, with the genes/inherited)
.. , , ()
/choose/- ; !
For
Gods, Societys yours sake, you (as any human) only live once, so
try
, try hard, to the best of your knowledge, abilities, skills & ,
to really find your (productive & honest) way to (successfully achieve your ideas/goals/values and so) be 2Us
i.e. to be healthily happy, instead of living your life with someone that you are ill-matched to!
, in the long run, lovely Jos,
together , (, ) partnership /couple, ()
objectively ;
( ) ;
like it or not, /relationship

no matter, if positively healthy or negatively unhealthy it, in fact, is! .

, no matter in the social-economic Strata,
(way of) (and sexuality) ( ) ;
[according to his () knowledge, ( ) thinking ( ) ,
based, , upon his (non-)objective values & (ir)rational principles!]
,
true pair.
[ long-term relationship of the (normal/ordinary) - them people, comprising pair,
are similar &
, in (the method of) thought!]
,
[ , ? -. . functional , , - its useful for both -or all- of them partners.]
( officially, on paper, ; , would prefer the non-marriage living together, at least for the first 7 years)
[remember ] ,
, , complicated

( ! -!) ,
a contract,
- its absolutely ; an absofuckinlutely rational thing to do! do it, lovely Jos!
,

,
( a young )( /know)

(later in his life)
(and their friends) -
() /irrationalities!
,
yes, lovely Josephine,

,

,
!
Dont leave it (arbitrary: or )

to ,
to the chance - just and consiously do it, ( really ).

true & real(istic) contract,

very ,
truly able,
/ ,

,

if open, honest & in their (presumably good, , well meant) intentions !
,

, .
( ) ( , ),
() really

[ -able to really plan- his own future,

based on property rights contract [and privacy];

property right is a moral right
i.e.
/relationship, lovely Jos,
mono-poly- & individual private propertys right & the law of attraction to (sexual) novelty/novex]
.
Use (your) rationality, use logic! Be practical [go by the
head], a , , going by the heart, on the urge of the moment!
Well boys and girls,

you ought to be ,
-
its extremely .
Partners stay together as long as they really choose to do it;
but if they
(, , ) ( )
,
together ,
() they are prepared and each of them could/can

walk away with minimum
,
and destructions ( , ?!).
,
(both partners)
,
, , , destructively both partners ( ), ? ?!

Oh, yes, a (fe)male ,

yes, can/could/should, lovely Jos,

/earn ,
- , , & (all now and) , in a lifetime;
can/should/ought to (earn/deserve to) live

healthily happy,
anytime, any place, with anybody, to the best of his
own choices, abilities and capacity made,
no matter
in the Strata!

& honest - for all partners in a relationship;
because love/sexappeal/2Us might
(suddenly) go away (and the 4Zs could walk in), you know!
Dont
(later) be disillusioned, disfunctional and (easily) vulnerable,
just
emotionally
rationally & objectively
!

-, lovely Jos,
( - ) :
/
gays/guys, - - ,
-- !
Yes, we (really) can. But not all of us.

*

? -

- - .
, ,
, .

- ? - .

-, - .

- , . , . .

[, the two become as one,
-in thought, motivation and action- , lovely jos,
ought to regonize & understand,
,
, to exist as separate () identities (individuals)!

Individuality is -and should always be placed- above & beyond all collective!

Its all about individuality, all about of independence! OK?
, lovely Josephine,
theres no such thing as
(or more) pplas one, into one(ness)! OK?]


To be objectively (cap)able to -
into other ppls souls (i.e. characters, minds). Long-term.
Thats
rare. And an beauty.

Arthur Schopenhauer: Der Mensch kann tun was er will; er kann aber nicht wollen was er will.

[One can choose what to do (free will and reasoning), but not what to want (his nature).]

[We can do what we wish, but we can only wish what we must.]

Francis Bacon: Nature [and human nature, too], to be commanded, must be obeyed.

Eastern proverb: "Everything in nature is diversity and diversity is nature."

[and let it be.]

Marilyn Monroe : This life is what you make it.
No matter what, you're going to mess up sometimes, it's a universal truth. But the good part is you get to decide how you're going to mess it up.
Girls will be your friends - they'll act like it anyway. But just remember, some come, some go.
The ones that stay with you through everything - they're your true best friends. Don't let go of them.
Also remember, sisters make the best friends in the world.
As for lovers, well, they'll come and go too. And baby, I hate to say it, most of them - actually pretty much all of them are going to break your heart,
but you can't give up because if you give up, you'll never find your soulmate.
You'll never find that half who makes you whole and that goes for everything.
Just because you fail once, doesn't mean you're gonna fail at everything. Keep trying, hold on, and always, always, always believe in yourself,
because if you don't, then who will, sweetie?
So keep your head high, keep your chin up, and most importantly, keep smiling, because life's a beautiful thing and there's so much to smile about.


RR:
(rationally thinking and acting) can/could / in his own pair/ ( 2 individuals, usually of different sex),
, if the individual rationally chooses - to move to/take part in another different tribe/pair.
This very often happens in reality, you know.


Marilyn Monroe : It's better to be unhappy alone than unhappy with someone.